OUIL501: Cop2 ideas
For survey:
Roll out to family to get a range of results -
interesting!! Any patterns? Correlations between age / gender? Generation?
-Thoughts on the survey from participants including my
family ? any notes and suggestions? successful? interesting? etc.
-BLOG THIS / ALL THEIR RESPONSES + thoughts on survey
and topic of psychoactive substances and creativity / MY RESULTS + survey
results / EMAILS to them / correspondence / whole process etc
Further ideas:
-Could create a digital "click" version for
people to participate in online? fb test? survey?
-An animated version which people can view as a
repeating gif online? made up of my final artwork pieces in their different
colour palettes/tones/repetitions/arrangement of key features / colours.
flashing to create an animation. any patterns to how psychedelic the results of
t/ experience of the gif - to what i found for each participant in my survey
results? are the people who answered more positively in the survey towards
psychoactive substance - do their artworks in the gif create a more psychedelic
experience when animated? what does this mean?
-does your experience with psychedelics impact your
creativity? and vs versa
e.g:
> When repeated and gif played….does the overall
composition and sequence when played fast - merge the artwork finals together
to create a psychedelic experience?
could test this by collating my final visual results
and artworks from my “are you wavy” interactive survey and make the doc in
aftereffects. each artwork (made of of the participants individual answer
tiles) added as a new frame or layer - one after the other, to be played fast
and repeated and manipulated to animate and warm/vortex?
could get all the mid answer participant final survey
artworks and animate these independently. Could see how the animated gif
results of these compare to the animated gif results of the vibrant more
“positive” participant answer finals and tiles and the least/negative
participant answer tiled final artworks. any patters? are the vibrant positive
participant gifs more psychedelic than the b&w negative participant answer
tiled final artworks?
the whole final image/tile for each participant (made
up of the 9 (or more if a more complex survey made) answer tiles to the
psychoactive questions - could flash in way that made it more or less
trip/warp/vortex RESEARCH THIS AND SIMILAR GIFS AND ANIMATIONS _ BLOG THIS AND
RESULTS ? LINKS TO VIDS!!)) depending on their results. each tile within the
image itself on that layer could also be manipulated in terms of colour
depending on the answer tile and how the person answered / its colour/its
answer meaning reflected in tone (i.e. more positive towards psychedelics =more
vibrant bright tones vs B=W for the negative responses to my survey
questions)/its content/aesthetics/detail could be warped to take the shape of a
more rorschach - eques compostition/ (what does this mean in terms of their
personality and what they would score in a rorschach tests?)
-each tile could act as if on a different level from
each other and / or the different levels could animate freely or as a group
depending on the common type of participant answer
>(i.e- vibrant foreground “top level/layer of image”
could show fast more animated moving elements /flases/ hues/ within the answer
tiles that showed a more POSITIVE response (these tiles only on this layer -
extract and have on a new layer/tile/frame/layer)
>the next layer down underneath this top vibrant
layer could have a layer which showed lesser moving/animated/manipulated
details made up of the individual tiled artworks with a half and half pallet
from that individual participants final survey artwork taking/showing only the
more “unsure” answers to my questions…
>and the bottom layer/frame/slide beneath these top
two would be a final background layer / layer showing only the tiles in a
b&w palette. the details of these tiles would be animated/slow
motion/less/warped/less psychedelic /to reflect results of survey
to reflect results of rorschach imagery should this
participant take it/respond to my sillier imagery and artwork test? to
rorschach ink blot artwork most reflective of a more “negative” response to the
original tests carried out?Explore and refer back to my research and findings
about the original tests! reflective of a more negative response to rorschach
test as well as the survey results and opinions of substances portrait
completed by and made up of the participants and their results to my survey.
do the overall layered/manipulated/animated/GIF
versions and generated creative visual experience made up of the survey results
for each participant VISUALLY COMMUNICATE / CONVEY ANY CORRELATION / PATTERN to
the results generated for their individual survey results and answers :
ie-
DOES A more vibrant artwork tile (to reflect a more
positive answer to my survey question put to the participant) within the final
survey artwork image for that survey participant (meaning most likely that
psychoactive substances have had a greater impact on them and there
creativity.) act as a creative device in relation to their other tiles within
their image and their tone & connotation to answers) mean / show any
conniptions / suggest any link / show that a more positive outlook towards
psychoactive substances, their uses, their history, their effect/impact and
their potential - determine a more psychedelic animation?
so the more positive towards psychedelics and their
potential (as a whole and also more specifically shown in the participants
survey answers to the questions more vibrant tiles in artwork — more positive?)
the more psychedelic my artwork/animation/gif — made up of the participants
final survey artwork visual tiles / whole results - manipulated and warped and
animated to show, reflect, convey, explain, manipulate, exaggerate, change and
excentuate these results and strengthen the overall message in my animated
results and project and portrayal of findings?
WHAT DOES THIS
MEAN? SHOULD PSYCHOACTIVE SUBSTANCES BE GIVEN A CHANCE AND LAWS CHANGE AND MORE
RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTS & EXPERIENCES BE HAD INTO THEIR POTENTIAL ?
_ DO MY RESULTS SHOW THAT THE MAJORITY OF SOCIETY
THINK PSYCHOACTIVE SUBSTANCES SHOULD BE GIVEN ANOTHER CHANCE? include as a
petition???
OR DO THEY SHOW THAT SOCIETY AND MY PARTICIPANTS DONT
KNOW MUCH ABOUT THEM/THEIR EFFECTS/IMPACT/POTENTIAL AND NEED TO BE EDUCATED AT
LEAST? -new personal project to do just this and spread the good and true
information about psychedelics, the experience and the potential. fuck the
pharmaceutical companies and their damage to our wallets and health! applies
for below aswel!….>
OR DO MY RESULT SHOW THAT THE MAJORITY OF PEOPLE ARE
HAPPY WITH THE CURRENT EFFECTS /EFFORT/ TAX PAYERS MONEY BEING SPENT / WAR ON
DRUGS / CONNOTATIONS OF THIS / ON SOCIETY/ CRIME/ HEALTH/ ECONOMY/ AND FEEL AS
IF THEY ARE DANGEROUS AND SHOULD BE MADE/REMAIN ILLEGAL?research into this
could consist of looking at countries such as portugal and amsterdam and states
in the USA where drugs or some drugs (list and research into each individual
type) are legal and look at the effects of these laws. effects on population?
addiction? economy? jobs? money? poverty? creativity? whats coming out of the
scene there? how are people reacting? had crime gone up or down? or people
taking more or less drugs? is the drug problem more or less? -what can the rest
of the worlds governments learn from this and implement? what does this mean
for the future of these substances and laws surrounding them? for research and
medicine?
additional question to ask participants in survey:
to follow on from current question: “do you feel as if
psychoactive substances deserve more time and research into their potential?
(could this be changed to: “do you feel as if we owe it to ourselves, to
society and the progression of research, health, science and understanding of
nature - to spend more time experiencing, researching into, learning more about
and understanding the true potential of psychoactive substances?)….”
-new possible follow on question: “If yes or unsure,
what group of psychoactive substances do you feel / would you deem as a
priority/ is most important to research into and gain an understanding of
first? Deem as having the most positive impact/ potential?
-medical potential?
-scientific?
-creative?
-spiritual?
-our consciousness
-mental health
-physical health?
-social skills?
-overall positive impact on the world and all living
things
etc etc etc - tons of separate answers and different
colour palettes for artwork tiles in the survey to reflect each answer and
wether its a positive or a negative or a neutral response to psychoactive
substances and the impact of psychedelic experiences on creativty- to make up
the overall final survey artwork/image.
-mini survey in itself? more in-depth than my larger
more broad one currently?
>could just word this to include all options as one
answer/survey question?
How do the artwork results link to Rorschach
(repetition and images seen within)
Could survey and Rorschach tests link in some way? A
survey linking questions and opinions to psychoactive substances, psychoactive
substance uses / impacts / effects / my survey results, creativity, psychadelic
a and psychoactives AND creativity AND personality traits (what the Rorschach
test is used for) to personalty traits of that person made up of what they see
within their final image made up of the psychedelic answer tilesed artwork?
therefore:>>>
Does how the participants answers to my survey
questions on psychoactive substances link to what they see within their artwork
created? Is their personality ( conveyed by the results of what they see in the
final image) influenced by their varying results tiles making up the original
image with the rorschach esq image /artwork on?
⁃
for instance: the more positive response/ opinion
/view of psychedelics (and their potential inc. their impact, the participants
experiences of) (shown and reflected in the artwork results to the survey by
the more positive brightly coloured answer tiles) - the more creative the personality (shown by
the kind of things the participants sees within their finished Rorschach -
esque "portrait" image made up of their survey answer segmented tiles
and the results to the questions asked of it :
⁃
What do you see in this image?
> A weird but more creative answer could be that
which is not the normal answer for that Rorschach ink blot slid (on average. )
a “normal” more common - LESS PSYCHEDELIC - answer to
being asked to look at their rorschach ink blot tests made up of their final
answer tiled arrangement following answering my survey questions - should be
could swap and change tones / tiles / results /
arrangements / final artworks/rorschach-esque tests and show to various
participants to compare between them.
> > i.e. -
do people in general, spot less abnormal imagery
within my rorschach slides that have the least colourful / dynamic aesthetic?
-each rorschach slide being in the form of artwork made up up a survey
participants answer tiles - who answered on the whole as having been least
impacted by psychoactive substances?)
>meaning that the less impact of psychedelics on a
person - the less creative, colourful, psychedelic, positive rorschach
image/slide generated from their survey answers. - meaning that less abnormal
imagery is seen in this final image? any correlation?
WORK THIS OUT!!!
remember main Q / AIM:
do psychedelics and our experiences and understanding
of them - affect our creativity?
our consciousness?
the way we respond to rorschach tests?
our personalities? (what the rorschach was originally
for!)
our ability to see things in a certain way?
our ability to see positive things/negative
things/cause us to respond more normally or abnormally to a rorschach ink blot
test or my generated tests?
see strange things (boobs) vs expected things
(bats/moths)
is it the amount of colour present in the final image
/ ink blot that is influencing what we are able see / our ink blot responses?
the amount of colour present (that directly links and
correlates between the amount a person has been influenced by psychedelics and
their opinion/view of them based on the types of answers they gave to my survey
questions on the subject)
suggests VISUALLY the impact of psychedelics on that
participant.
high impact of substance/more positive answers to
survey questions
=
more positively vibrant tiles chosen
=
more vibrant psychedelic tiles present, making up
final image/rorschach slide
=
more positive, artistic, psychedelic, bright aesthetic
of overall final made up image / artwork / composition
=
shows a more positive portrayal of that participant
and their overall more positive view of physchadelics/their impact and opinion
of their potential
…… does this
mean that another person looking at this final vibrant + positive rorschach
slide/tiled survey results…. is more likely to respond strangely to the
image/see strange/odd/psychadelic shapes in the vibrant inkblot?
does this show a correlation between colour and consciousness
and psychedelics? the more colour in an ink blot the more a person responds
strangely / imaginatively to the rorschach and see more strange unusual things
within. DOES THIS MEAN MORE COLOUR IS MORE CREATIVE?
any patterns between what they see and what others see
when also looking at this slide? collate results
-or does this have no affect on what is seen /
deciphered when looking at this slide as part of a roschach-esque test (and
compared to other slides of a different conveyed response / opinion?)
breakdown of theory/study:
do people in general
(not just that specific participant and their
individual visual rorschach response to their own individual final
answers/results/artwork made up of the answer tiles chosen as a result of them
partaking in my psychedelic survey)
tend to respond less strangely to / see less
psychedelic abnormal imagery / have the least response too /
(such as:
strange things, boobs, penus’s etc)
within the rorschach final slide /imagery/rorschach
ink blot tests /artwork / finals made up of arranged
answer tiles from the survey
made up of answer tiles reflected of a participants
survey question results
who answered as having least / shown to be less
affected by psychedelics
who tend to see more normal things
((such as: bats, witches, figures, faces, masks,
moths, skulls etc - the normal expected answers in a Rorschach ink blot test))
and how i this conveyed /
show / interpret / convey / be made clear to the audience
in the visual survey results of that partaker?
(with the help of the overall arrangement of the tiles
making up the rorschach artwork itself and the connotations of this and to the
results obtained for that specific participant and their artwork result
generated
*(i.e.: higher psychedelic impact + more positive
response to substances + their potential and answers to my survey questions = more vibrant tiles making up the final image for that
participant
——the more of these tiles - the more positively the
participant answered - the more overall positive view of psychedelics - the
higher impact psychedelics have had on that participant ——
>VS / separate from<
no psychedelic impact + more negative opinion of
physchadelics and their potential + more negative answers to my survey q’s =B+w
tiles,
__ the more of these B&W tiles present in the
final overall images and rorschach test, the more negatively the participant
answered in the survey - the more negative answers therefore the overall
predominately colourless aesthetic and arrangement and palette (making up the individual details/ink blots /
rorschach image / slide subject) would show / convey the lesser/ least impact
of psychedelics on that participant and the view they have on the substances
>VS /
separate from / separate to<
a medium psychedelic impact + more neutral outlook /
unsure of / medium opinion of psychedelics and their potential = half and half
coloured tiles
____ the more of these mid tiles/ 2 toned tiles (half
and half palette in artwork) representing the participants survey answers with
a more neutral/un-bias/unsure response to my survey questions on psychedelics -
—the more neutrally coloured the overall final artwork / rorschach slide and
aesthetic will look to other participants - therefore the participant answered
more questions neutrally overall conveying their more neutral opinion of
psychedelics on the whole.
that this and other participants are looking at. (made
up of tiles reflective of answers made by a participant who answered with the
least psychedelic impact) with
- for artwork
New main concept :
(Can I link in any of these other ideas / concepts
somehow??-see iPhone notes for cop artwork ideas)